At page 7, the Review Officer stated:
“ I have always felt the great scope of authority granted to the EST as conceived by the UBC Constitution presents a risk in the New York District Council. That is one of the reasons that the office is different here, for instance, arguably fettered by the unique hiring process for business representatives required by the District Council Bylaws. The Bylaws endeavored to strike a proper balance between the authority of the EST, the Delegate Body and mandatory process – all with oversight of an Inspector General and a compliance overlay4. I would not presently recommend that any offices be eliminated or created. In my view, the governance is still a fledgling. Despite some growing pains, I think the system will not only work, but serve the District Council well. Much will depend on the commitment of all to take it seriously, master the Bylaws, study issues and engage in collegial debate.”
The obvious should not escape this honorable Court – that being, The District Councils EST usurped his proper balance and authority by facilitating Executive control of the Agenda in continuance of racketeering
throughout the course of the alleged contract negotiations, presentation of the MOU and the alleged vote on what was, is and remain nothing more than notes kept relative to basic discussions during a period where the racketeering continued unabated in direct violation of Prong 1 of the Consent Decree (Elimination of Racketeering).
The D.C. & Contractor Associations now wish to insult the rank & file member and the Courts intelligence via the ‘nunc pro tunc’ diversionary argument to dissuade the Court that EST Bilello’s schoolboy type notes now constitute a formal contract which had yet been developed or voted upon; and which contract was first presented to the Court on March 12, 2013 and first received by members and Council Delegate Body members via PACER on March 13, 2013.EST Bilello and President Lebo were engaged in “Executive control of the agenda in continuance of Racketeering” during the entire period when the MOU was operative.
In direct contravention to subsequent/recent submissions of NYCDCC in house counsel Murphy false statements and the Review Officers charges against the NYCDCC EST for a;
NOTICE OF POSSIBLE ACTION: (source, 157blogspot.com)
Breaking News...The New York City District Council of Carpenters is once again rocked by scandal as Executive Secretary-Treasurer Michael Bilello faces a possible veto for among other things, failing to abide by Section 21 of the District Council Bylaws and caused or attempted to cause employer compensation for members to be directed to the New York City District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund, according to a notice of possible action letter signed by Review Officer Dennis Walsh.
* Where the former R.O. Dennis Walsh blew it was when we presented him with incontrovertible proof and the signatures of Bilello, Lebo & Cavanaugh on the Hod Hoist Carriers illegal pay raise diversion (all of the hourly raise) directly to the Welfare Trust Fund in direction violation of 8-5-11 NYCDCC By-Law Sec. 21
to the tune of $38M ayear at 18M Man-Hours which amounted to racketeering by both D.C. Executives & the Trustees/Fiduciaries at the Welfare Trust Fund raping the members for $166 Million to $200 Million over the remaing 4.33 year life of the contract; pending total man-hours over each successive year.
R.O. Walsh & USAO's Bhararra & Torrance should have convened a grand jury and indicted all the players and he should have immediately vetoed Bilello, Lebo & Cavanuagh at that time.
Instead - he covered for them and apologized for them and jerked us around for another year before he got rid of either of them via the Veto Pen;
albeit for reasons other than criminal racketeering. We put it squarely under his nose & he balked. He shouldn't have a bar card at this point in time as these actions and his cover-up expressly violated Prong 1 of the Consent Decree - Elimination of Racketeering. Instead of preventing it and reporting it to the Court, he directly participated in it.
I.M. McGorty isn't bright enough or up to speed on any issue on this 25-1/2 year docket to even remotely begin to follow the bouncing ball. And the new mobbed up Jersey Council known as the NRCC are laughing their ass'es off on the other side of the Hudson. Educated members could do a better job than him in their sleep while on an Irish drunk, even if they ain't Irish; far better in fact than this boob.
How the hell do you hire a candidate for a labor case who has zero credentials or expertise in Labor Law and then expect the dimwitted fool to recognize much less prevent further racketeering
(his alleged criminal background aside). How many cases did this guy actually win in 15-years that weren't no brainers spoon fed to him by underlings.
The D.C.'s counter to that was to hire an ex-judge who also readily admits she has no clue about labor law 101.
Talk about an abortion of Justice.
All criminal suspects are guilty of all charges; damn it - I meant innocent until proven guilty in a corruption free court of law; or are they?
excerpt form: 4-10-13 Letter (submission) to Judge Berman