Reply – Re: TUTOR PERINI/HUDSON YARDS PRESS RELEASE
Your Name
Subject
Message
or Cancel
In Reply To
Re: TUTOR PERINI/HUDSON YARDS PRESS RELEASE
— by Ted Ted
original post Feb. 2013;

EXACT SAME APPLICATION TO THE $100 MILLION DOLLAR KISS TO ROSS & TUTOR, COURTESY OF DOUGLAS J. MCCARRON; NOTWITHSTANDING THE ADDITIONAL 20% WAGE KICK-BACK FOR THE LIFE OF THE $20+ BILLION DOLLAR PROJECT - (BEFORE CHANGE ORDERS OF COURSE)

NOTE: THE GRAFT & EMBEZZLEMENT OF THE $100 MILLION of FUNDS FROM THE NYCDCC BENEFIT TRUST FUNDS OCCURRED PRIOR TO the aforementioned  FAILED ATTEMPT TO COVER THEIR PROVERBIAL ASSES BY RUNNING TO OBAMA & A CORRUPT CONGRESS TO HAVE THEM APPROVE THE NCCMP IN LATE DEC 2014!

TOO LITTLE TO LATE ASSHOLES; YOU ARE ALL GUILTY AS CHARGED; NOW WHERE THE FUCK IS THAT LITTLE SHIT PREET BHARARRA - HE'S OVER-DUE FOR SOME MORE BRIBE DOUGH TO KEEP THIS ONE OUT OF A REAL COURT OF LAW.

ALL THE BENEFITS OF THE $100M dollar laon inure to ROSS & TUTOR & MCCARRON, NOT TO THE MEMBERS AS THE LAW PRESCRIBES. COUNSELOR MURPHY - PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE INTEREST & DIVIDENED PAYMENTS TO BE MADE TO THE FUNDS FOR USE ON BEHALF OF MEMBER INTERESTS AS WELL AS ALL LSHORT OR LONG TERM LEASE OR SALE ARRANGEMENT FOR EVERY UNIT IN HUDSON YARDS, FOR EVERY EXECUTED CONTRACT TO DATE & SHOW THE COURT (BERMAN) WHERE THE MEMBERS & THEIR BENEFIT TRUST FUNDS BENEFIT (THE OPERATIVE WORD) LONG TERM FROM THE ILLEGAL USE OF THEIR CAPITAL?
----------------------------


2414  29 U.S.C. 501(c)—Embezzlement and Theft From Labor Unions in the Private Sector; 18 U.S.C. 664—Embezzlement and Theft From Employee Benefit Plans in the Private Sector

Section 501(c) prohibits the embezzlement and theft of property from a labor organization covered by the Labor-Management Reporting and Disclosure Act (LMRDA) (29 U.S.C. § 401, et seq.). Statutory principals are officers of and persons employed directly or indirectly by such labor organizations. Labor organizations which represent only employees of the United States or of state and local governments are not regulated by the LMRDA. However, United States Postal Service employees are subject to the LMRDA.

Section 664 prohibits the embezzlement and theft of property by any person from an employee pension or welfare benefit plan subject to title I of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. The statute also prohibits embezzlement and theft from a "fund connected" with such an employee benefit plan. Employee benefit plans which are excluded from regulation by ERISA include church plans and benefit plans which are established or maintained by the United States or state or local governments on behalf of their employees. See 29 U.S.C. § 1003.
_____________________

The Vacation Fund, prior to incorporation with the Welfare Fund, was thus a "fund connected", thus covering the violations from the programs inception/start by McCarron & Forde & approved by former Judge/IRO Conboy (why does he still have a bar card?).

From the merger date foward, the Vacation Fund monies extorted from members wages specifically qualify for embezzlement under Sec. 664, notwithstanding the false claims/statements of the D.C.'s legal counsel as stated in their September 28, 2012 filing of the LM-2 with the Federal Government, item no. 69, noted as follows:


The District Council has been advised by counsel for the District Council Welfare Fund and its Vacation Fund program (the "Funds") that the Employer Trustees of the Funds may assert a third-party claim for damages against the District Council in Enright, et al. v. NYC District Council of Carpenters Welfare Fund, et al. SDNY, 12-CV-04181 (JPO)(JLC). The Enright action was filed on May 25, 2012 in federal district court for the Southern District of New York. The plaintiffs seek to represent a class of District Council retired members who were required to pay increased premiums for continuing medical coverage as a result of an arbitrator’s award deciding a deadlock between the Union and Employer Trustees over cutbacks in benefits to save the Welfare Fund from potentially ruinous deficit spending. Among the confusing allegations in the complaint is one related to Union dues’ check-off assignments by District Council members from their quarterly Vacation Fund distributions. The District Council’s counsel is reviewing the facts and controlling case, statutory, and regulatory law concerning possible third-party claims against the District Council related to the voluntary (MY ASS) assignment by Union members of part of their quarterly Vacation Fund distributions. Preliminarily, counsel does not see a prohibited transaction directly related to the actual sums deducted and remitted from quarterly Vacation Fund distributions under check-off assignments by Union members.

Too funny - the Review Officer Dennis Walsh did. Moreover, he recommended settling with Brian Brennan, albeit via a confidential settlement made in the hopes that the remainder of the claims would go away and never be tried.

The fact is, the known & long settled law & precedent have been posted here for quite some time. Judge Conboy was in on the scam & yet he still retains his bar card. The dirty hands & players in this Hobbs Act extortion scheme are there for all to see, yet, to date - zero action on the part of the United States Attorneys Office who via their default and failure to take any corrective action and/or file suit against the District Council or UBCJA International and its officers, agents, principals trustees/ alleged fiduciairies (both sides) is also involved in the cover-up and the corresponding fraud upon the so called honorable Court.

And people wonder why this 23-1/2 year criminal RICO action & the 19-year old Consent Decree has yet to take a bite out of crime. The easy answer is simple - because in NYC it obviously pays to be dirty. Akin to Forde's attitude, the D.C.'s new in house counsel & it's outside vendors believe that by telling a lie long enough, it will then retain the air of truth or credibility. The facts say otherwise. Maybe its time for the DOJ to go after a few bar cards, unless of course they pull the get out of jail card along with some favors and buy their way out with an insurance settlement.

All attorneys are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.

** All criminal suspects and their co-conspirators and partners in crime whether they be in the RO or USAO's office, the Federal District Court and/or sitting on the bench feignining stupidity are guilty until proven innocent - ahh; shit, I meant innocent until proven guilty in a corruption free court of law, or are they?