– Re: JUDGE BERMAN, the PYSCHOLOGIST on ARROGANCE, FEDERAL ELECTION GUIDELLINE...
In Reply To
On May 21, a judge of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California dismissed a complaint filed by a woman who said she had purchased "Cap'n Crunch with Crunchberries" because she believed "crunchberries" were real fruit. The plaintiff, Janine Sugawara, alleged that she had only recently learned to her dismay that said "berries" were in fact simply brightly-colored cereal balls, and that although the product did contain some strawberry fruit concentrate, it was not otherwise redeemed by fruit. She sued, on behalf of herself and all similarly situated consumers who also apparently believed that there are fields somewhere in our land thronged by crunchberry bushes.
It's a good thing this case was not heard by Judge Berman.
He probably would have issued an ultimatum to the cereal manufacturer to create a crunchberry bush, or face the demotion of captain crunch to Lieutenant.
A woman sued the Cap'n Crunch people because her cereal didn't contain any "crunchberries":