Reply – Re: 50-50% or 67-33% or 90%-10% EXCLUSIVE NYCDCC HIRING HALL
Your Name
Subject
Message
or Cancel
In Reply To
Re: 50-50% or 67-33% or 90%-10% EXCLUSIVE NYCDCC HIRING HALL
— by Ted Ted
Once the NYCDCC formally declares the District Council to be under NLRA Section 9(a) Contracts (vs. 8(f)); the D.C. loses its Non-Exclusive Hiring Hall status & the District Council; under NLRA Sec. 9(a) officially becomes a 100% "Exclusive Hiring Hall" under the Gene Clarke NLRB & 2nd Circuit precedent decisions.

Whether or not the UBCJA & NYCDCC offer proof via signed Authorization Cards is another story. We'll soon see if McGorty has the balls or brains to take this one into Judge Bermans Courtroom to offer formal & legal proof of same.

Should he fail to get his ducks in a row & offer the formal/legal proof required under Federal Labor Law, then both he & the D.C's hack attorneys need to be brought before the State Bar Association on charges of corruption.

Short of that, the corrupt New York City & Vicinty District Council can hold the Representation Election as required by Federal Law.

Your move McGorty