Reply – Re: WALSHS LAST THEIVERY STAND
Your Name
Subject
Message
or Cancel
In Reply To
Re: WALSHS LAST THEIVERY STAND
— by 1456 1456
All you have to do is look at the transcript of the harkin trail.oflarrety is asked how the investigation started and he said it was because of a hot line call into the ro office.upon review of the phone records there was no such call ,in there was only one call about 1456 to the hot line and when that was investigated it was found to be resolved properly by the local. There were no complaints to the hot line about dinnersto the hot line .Walsh wouldn't let any of his witnesses testify or they wouldn't testify because the would of had to purger themselves like oflarrety did at the trial.fitzmaurze dainleson and the rest would have been able to stand up to areal cross examination.not only should oflarrety be fired any case he testified in should be over turned.