Reply – Re: 8(f) Pre-Hire vs. 9(a) Exclusive Rep Agreements under PLA/PSA Contracts
Your Name
Subject
Message
or Cancel
In Reply To
Re: 8(f) Pre-Hire vs. 9(a) Exclusive Rep Agreements under PLA/PSA Contracts
— by Ted Ted
When the UBCJA goes into a real court of law (as opposed to Judge Berman's) they get their ass handed to them every single time on every issue.

DeCarlo & Shanley's track record in court is abysmal. Private contracts do not negate, alter, shred or eviscerate federal labor law nor does our Federal Constitution or Judicial precedent allow those authoring & profiting from their creation to usurp the role of the legislature or to usurp the Congressional authority to amend, alter or change federal labor laws such as the NLRA, LMRA, LMRDA, ERISA etc.; except in NYC where corruption still reigns supreme. This is of course notwithstanding the phony Walsh apathy card or the snide quips presented with each Interim Report to the Court; such as:

________________________
C-BOX

3rd Interim Report: Anonymous October 29, 2014 at 4:29 PM

Men at sometime are masters of their fates;
The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, But in ourselves, that we are underlings.


Shakespeare, Julius Caesar, I, ii 3rd Interim Report of Review Office
________________________

3rd Interim Report: 3rd Interim Report of Review Officer

Hardly Dennis; rather, the fault lie in those gaming the system who ignore the U.S. Constitution, every Federal labor law on the books and Appellate & U.S. Supreme Court precedent as it applies to trade unions and who routinely usurp the Congressional authority to legislate and amend Federal labor law to suit their corrupt agenda and continued 50-state racketeering scheme while ignoring their own sworn oaths to uphold the law & the courts sworn duty to enforce precedent vs. making it up as they go.
________________________

3rd Interim Report: The primary vehicle used to accomplish this is the illegal and continued denial of 'standing' for NYCDCC rank & file members to be heard in the Federal District Court; for, without standing, your phony bull**** relative to Brutus was applied because you associate everyone in the brotherhood as brutes incapable of original thought, action or plan and too stupid to know what's good for them.
________________________

3rd Interim Report: It's got nothing to do with Brutus or Shakespeare, rather - it has more to do with all of your arrogant, we are above the law attitudes. None of you assholes should hold a bar card in any state and you all belong in jail for your 4+ year crime spree.

* All suspects are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law, or are they?