Reply – Re: CARPENTERS DENIED...ELECTION GOES FORWARD...AGAIN THEY LOSE
Your Name
Subject
Message
or Cancel
In Reply To
Re: CARPENTERS DENIED...ELECTION GOES FORWARD...AGAIN THEY LOSE
— by Richard Dorrough Richard Dorrough
Did you expect any different based on what the UBC used to call for the review.. Tell your readers what this means and what documents it refers to ..The Intervenor’s Motion for the Board to Take Administrative Notice of certain documents is granted.

 No Ill tell you .They are the Walsh RO documents dealing with corruption.

Now yes or no. Did Angelo do this???MR. BISCEGLIE: One other thing, your Honor. Mr. Walsh mentions in his letter a number of individuals and I just want to note for the record,10 Mr. Ficorotta, Mr. Arzana, John Harkin -- THE COURT: If you could spell the nmaes

John H-A-R-K-I-N, and Charles H-A-R-K-I-N. None of these individuals are involved in any way shape or form with the amalgamated dock builders, contrary to what Mr. Walsh suggested in lis letter. Mr. Holt and Mr. Boston are here in the Court today and they'll address the Court separately, your Honor.

 First there is no such entity as the Amalgamated Dockbuilders and Second is this a LIE. Is it not fact these individuals are indeed a part of the new dockbuilders Union??

Someones knocking at the door
Somebodys ringing the bell
Someones knocking at the door
Do me a favor
and let them in