– Re: Lets Get to Work: NYCDC Draft BYLAWS
In Reply To
Walsh has given his Stamp of Approval to it, not prevented it. He should be removed as the RO by Judge Berman.
The 2-Prong & primary purpose of CV 90 (5722) is this:
Restoration of Democratic Principles & Elimination of Corruption
By Publishing this pile of crap, with his tacit approval via lack of commentary, no line item vetoes etc, no citations to case-law showing where & why the UBC is wrong.....Walsh failed the Test. He is afterall the so-called "Lead Attorney" assigned by the Court to preserve members rights & enforce compliance with the Consent Decree.
Anyone ever say Yes to Doug? Anyone ever say No to Doug? - quote: Ted Kennedy @ 2005 UBC Convention.....seems to me Walsh says - yes Doug.
Rich - the central governing body langauge negates the NLRA & all Local's Autonomy on one fell swoop - RO Walsh should be keenly aware of this fact, however by his publication w/o comment attached, w/o reference to known law(s) & precedent case-law he's ceded all control to Doug & pretty much voided the purpose of the consent decree....the elimination of corruption.