– Re: Dear Richard, where did this come from?
In Reply To
"NYC locals are not under supervision.
Neither are the upstate locals.
Now which is it??So we are not in trusteeship but bound by the trusteeship.
I dont give a rats ass how many times you write it. YOU ARE bound by the Trusteeship. We are not. Your relationship with the council is one of erroneously declared membership while ours is affiliation
The change to dealing with employers has just happened as I said over and over. A designated Council job rep was just announced along with the plans for a Council dispatch system WHICH WE DO NOT HAVE.100% mobility.WHICH WE DO NOT HAVE. We do NOT HAVE bylaws that give control of our local to the Council as you do.WE DO NOT have trials or grievances by the council as you do.Stop repeating your BS over and over and then tell yourself its true.
Although you refuse to either accept it or comprehend it we DO have more powers than the NYC locals. We have not had our nuts completely cut off as you have but that is what we they are trying to finish off. Is is true that you do not have a clue as to the status of our Upstate locals so stop running your mouth as if you do
"Upstate locals are in the same boat as NYC locals, you are bound by the trusteeship of your district council."