Reply – MANDATORY ARBITRATION UNDER THE UBC CBA's
Your Name
Subject
Message
or Cancel
In Reply To
MANDATORY ARBITRATION UNDER THE UBC CBA's
— by Ted Ted
This case involves DR HORTON, Inc & Michael Cuda, an individual. This is a short 9-page read by the ALJ in Atlanta, most probably to be fastracked to the NLRB Board on Appeal as it is representative of not just UBC Corporatism, but all corporatism in all Unionized Workforces.

Arbitration - by chosen insiders which the UBC hand picks is the chosen way to go - as they can then control the decisions & clearly use it as a means to "run the clock", that being the stautory 6-Month Timieline to file charges for Violations of the NLRA.

The UBC & the Councils use Legal Counsel funded by your deductions & play this game as a matter of routine with ill informed UBC brothers & Sisters. It is a topic worthy of discussion & distribution so other members can be educated on their rights.

http://www.nlrb.gov/shared_files/ALJ%20Decisions/2011/JD(ATL)-32-10.pdf