Reply – Re: UBC International Refuses right Under 25 b to create local bylaws
Your Name
Subject
Message
or Cancel
In Reply To
Re: UBC International Refuses right Under 25 b to create local bylaws
— by Ted Ted
Hi Anon -

Make pretend friends at the Labor Board....if I am wrong - have the twit post their name & bar card number here online. Anon - You fail to comprehend the Law!.

All it consists of is: Words, Punctuation, Context, Case-law Precedence. Past that come the Lawyering gamesmanship within the state & federal rules of civil procedure, local court rules & playing that game.

FACT: THE LEGAL ISSUE IS....the "CONDITION PRECEDENT". What is the condition precedent addressed in Lebovitz.......?

The answer is, the "condition precedent to employment is....compliance with the UBC's Constitution & Bylaws, which as you know have been ruled "FACIALLY UNLAWFUL" & in Violation of NLRA Section 8(b)(1)(A)

Facially Unlawful means, on its face, no further explanation required, easily discernable to the common everyday man, in plain, clear & unequivocal English. so simple - Forrest Gump would get it - yet you persist with your obfuscation, chicanery & semantics. You continue your lies and the charade, which lead to one conclusion:

You are a HIRED GUN, ANON = UNION BUSTER

This is about educating members, presenting facts, actual cases for them to read & digest so they can stand up for their rights under Federal Labor law. Everyone else on this blog have done just that, everyone but you that is.

When proved wrong, you always resort to personal attacks. However, that does matter, we will not be deterred.



ANON = UNION BUSTER