In the Recent opinion and order by Judge Berman on the Nee, Messinetti action, Judge berman and walsh are equally guilty of racketeering. But if it is the government breaking the law, it must be ok?
N.Y. PEN. LAW § 460.20 : NY Code - Section 460.20: Enterprise corruption
Search N.Y. PEN. LAW § 460.20 : NY Code - Section 460.20: Enterprise corruption
Search by Keyword or Citation
1. A person is guilty of enterprise corruption when, having knowledge of the existence of a criminal enterprise and the nature of its activities, and being employed by or associated with such enterprise, he: (a) intentionally conducts or participates in the affairs of an enterprise by participating in a pattern of criminal activity; or (b) intentionally acquires or maintains any interest in or control of an enterprise by participating in a pattern of criminal activity; or (c) participates in a pattern of criminal activity and knowingly invests any proceeds derived from that conduct, or any proceeds derived from the investment or use of those proceeds, in an enterprise. 2. For purposes of this section, a person participates in a pattern of criminal activity when, with intent to participate in or advance the affairs of the criminal enterprise, he engages in conduct constituting, or, is criminally liable for pursuant to section 20.00 of this chapter, at least three of the criminal acts included in the pattern, provided that: (a) Two of his acts are felonies other than conspiracy; (b) Two of his acts, one of which is a felony, occurred within five years of the commencement of the criminal action; and (c) Each of his acts occurred within three years of a prior act. 3. For purposes of this section, the enterprise corrupted in violation of subdivision one of this section need not be the criminal enterprise by which the person is employed or with which he is associated, and may be a legitimate enterprise. Enterprise corruption is a class B felony.
- See more at: http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/nycode/PEN/FOUR/X/460/460.20#sthash.vXdzoNHS.dpuf
The U.S. Supreme Court has instructed federal courts to follow the continuity-plus-relationship test in order to determine whether the facts of a specific case give rise to an established pattern. Predicate acts are related if they "have the same or similar purposes, results, participants, victims, or methods of commission, or otherwise are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics and are not isolated events." (H.J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.) Continuity is both a closed and open ended concept, referring to either a closed period of conduct, or to past conduct that by its nature projects into the future with a threat of repetition.
What is this outsider babbling about? Are scraps from the internet gathered by some twelve year old supposed to mean something? Does someone have proof of enterprise corruption or RICO violations? Take your proof to the dozens of federal and state agencies that would love to investigate, indite, prosecute, convict and imprison every UBC functionary. Opinions, feelings, and suppositions aren't proof.
When this outsider is old enough to drink let the outsider go to a bar; in the interim drugs and obscenity in the bathroom may, hopefully, keep the outsider from trying to distract us from the renewal of our union.
Norman, I am so proud of you! Your ability to heal the sick, cure the blind, and walk on water amazes me! Your power to discern my age from postings on a website is astounding! Your great accomplishments in renewing the entire UBC singlehandedly will not go unnoticed by your father, thou art in heaven, and may the world always revolve around your greatness! Please continue to bless those that worship you with your almighty abilities, and continue to pour your heart out to those that would serve you in your endeavors!!!