3-Proposed NLRA Amendments

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
3 messages Options
Ted
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

3-Proposed NLRA Amendments

Ted
Posted on July 26, 2012 by Ilyse Schuman

Print
Trackbacks
Share Link

On Wednesday the House Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and Pensions held a hearing to discuss three legislative proposals to amend the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).

During the hearing – Examining Proposals to Strengthen the National Labor Relations Act – members of the subcommittee and panelists debated the merits of:

 - the Rewarding Achievement and Incentivizing Successful Employees (RAISE) Act, (pdf)

 - Secret Ballot Protection Act, (pdf) and;

 - the Tribal Labor Sovereignty Act. (pdf)
 
The RAISE Act would amend the NLRA to permit employers whose workplaces are governed by collective bargaining agreements (CBAs) to reward their employees with additional wages or other compensation for their job performance. Under current law, providing employees whose CBAs do not address merit pay with individual bonuses constitutes “direct dealing” prohibited by the NLRA.

Tim Kane, Chief Economist of the Hudson Institute, spoke in favor of this bill. He said that the RAISE Act has the potential to remove some of the negative effects of unionization, and would have “no potential to hurt jobs or wages.” According to his productivity analysis, the legislation would result in a 10% increase in pay, and 200,000 new jobs.
 
The Secret Ballot Protection Act introduced last year would guarantee the right to secret ballot union representation elections. William L. Messenger, attorney with the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, testified on behalf of this bill. He stated that a secret ballot election should be a condition of unionization. He claimed that employees are more apt to vote their conscience in a private voting booth, and that Congress should also improve employees’ rights to decertify a union.
 
Finally, the Tribal Labor Sovereignty Act would exempt “any enterprise or institution owned and operated by an Indian tribe and located on its Indian lands” from the NLRA’s coverage. In recent years the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has extended its jurisdiction over businesses owned and operated by Native Americans. Robert Odawi Porter, President of the Seneca Nation of Indians, said that this measure would reassert tribal sovereignty over tribal affairs.
 
Ranking subcommittee member Robert Andrews (D-NJ), however, took issue with the legislation discussed during the hearing. He claimed that the “record is devoid of any indication that the enactment of these bills would engender economic growth.” Andrews argued also that the hearing was premised “on a narrative that is untrue.” Specifically, he denied the contention that the Board under the current administration has hindered jobs and employee rights. According to Andrews, the current Board has issued more unanimous decisions than did the prior Board.
 
Union-side attorney Devki K.Virk agreed, claiming that the bills discussed during the hearing would “actively undermine” the structure of federal labor relations policy. For example, Virk argued that the RAISE Act would take the issue of wages and “shift it back to the employer.”

{This is a very poor argument, so the operative question is:

Should a man or woman with 15, 20, 25 or 30+ years of experience who is a hustler, who comes in prepared to work & produce, who subscribes to additional training through his or her union or of their own initiative be rewarded with higher wages or benefits over & above the base package offered via a union contract (CBA)?}
 
A complete list of the hearing witnesses, links to their testimony, and an archived webcast of the session can be found here.

Tags: Labor-Management Relations, RAISE Act, Secret Ballot Protection Act
 

Trackbacks (0)Links to blogs that reference this articleTrackback URL
http://www.dcemploymentlawupdate.com/admin/trackback/282962


Comments (0)Read through and enter the discussion with the form at the end

 
Littler Mendelson’s Government Affairs Team closely monitors, tracks and reports on legislation, regulations, federal agency activity, and executive orders thatMore...
 
Subscribe
Add this blog to your feeds or put your e-mail in the box below and hit GO to subscribe by e-mail.

 



Topics Agency Changes
Agency Happenings
Agency Rulemaking
Announcements
Arbitration
Business Restructuring
Congressional Leadership
Discrimination in the Workplace
EEOC
EFCA
Employee Benefits
Employment Taxes
Employment Wage and Hour Law
Events
Executive Compensation
Federal Contracts

----------------------------------------

SOURCE/LINKS:

http://www.dcemploymentlawupdate.com/2012/07/articles/labormanagement-relations/legislation-to-amend-the-nlra-examined-at-house-hearing/

---------------------------------

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 3-Proposed NLRA Amendments

DISSIDENT
The Raise act would undermine collective bargaing. If we so chose as union members to put performance clauses in our CBA's we could. Although our union is not run by the members for the membership anymore. The secret ballot protection act would definately help us and should be pused by the membership to regain control of our representation , which has been taken away by Mccaron and his appointed scum. Individual members should write their congressmen to tell them to support THE SECRET BALLOT PROTECTION ACT.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: 3-Proposed NLRA Amendments

Michael
All three of these bills are anti-union. 'Secret Balloting' sounds good, but what it would actually do is make unionising a workplace more difficult. This bill would outlaw Card-check which would allow the workplace to be organized if 50 percent of workers at the site sign a union card. Really, anything that is proposed by this republican house and is supported by an organization called National Right to Work is bad for us. Look, I do not like McCaron either, he was buddies with George Bush, no friend of labor.